Still pending before the Supreme Court this week is an appeal from Trump's lawyers that seeks the firing of three Democratic ...

To cover the Supreme Court these days is to catalogue its lawlessness. The conservative justices’ latest decision in McMahon ...

Mark Joseph Stern: Under federal law, Trump cannot remove Powell over a policy disagreement. Federal law expressly allows for ...

The Roberts Court has asked for reargument in a key redistricting case, a move that strongly suggests the conservative ...

While the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority is pushing the law rightward, the justices appointed by GOP presidents ...

When the Supreme Court overturns rulings without offering any explanation, it is simply wielding raw power. And raw power ...

NPR's Steve Inskeep speaks with Georgetown University law professor Stephen Vladeck about a recent pattern within the Supreme Court majority: issuing rulings with no written opinion.

By a two-to-one margin, the public believes justices prioritize politics over the law. That's a disaster for the Supreme ...

In their decision allowing the Trump administration to dismantle the Department of Education, the justices didn’t offer one ...

The conservative wing of the Supreme Court gave the middle finger to Congress, low-income families, student-loan holders, ...

Many legal commentators apparently believe that, in the term that just ended, the Supreme Court further enabled President ...

In a precedent-based legal system, you can’t know what the law is if you don’t have judicial opinions explaining why the courts have reached their conclusions.