The Trump administration is exploiting a loophole to keep a funding freeze in place, leaving researchers in limbo.
The change would cap the "indirect cost" reimbursement rates for any grant at 15%. In contrast, Cold Spring Harbor Lab's ...
The National Institutes of Health introduced a new cap on funding allocation, and sent shockwaves across the U.S.'s top ...
Vanderbilt is one of several research universities nationally very concerned about cuts to NIH grant funding. We went inside ...
After the National Institute’s of Health announced it would reduce how much funding it gives to state medical research, Idaho ...
After the National Institutes of Health issued an order Friday night that would dramatically reduce funding, professor ...
The suits were filed in rapid succession in the days after the NIH announced on February 7 that it would cap so-called ...
Laboratories would literally go dark,” says a medical research insider, if Trump administration cuts to NIH funding go ...
5h
"We just cannot take this," one scientist said, as UMass Chan Medical School stands to lose about $41 million in annual ...
A lab worker fired from the National Institutes of Health as part of the Trump administration’s widespread cuts says years of ...
Criticism of NIH and its grants is laid out in Project 2025, a document that outlined potential reforms if Trump were to be ...
The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback