Why: Although monolithic architectures are making a comeback, the best way to build distributed software solutions is through the use of service-based architectures. Find out more about Visual Studio ...

Microservices break up monolithic code into discrete chunks that are easier to maintain. Here's an overview and a look at the pros and cons of migrating to a microservices architecture.

In my experience, businesses often want to move from a monolithic architecture to a composable one because of the potential advantages of flexibility and scalability.

Monolithic architecture was the standard for decades and provides several benefits over microservices. As a general rule, monolithic applications are easier to design and develop because they are ...

The data, computing workload and communication can all be distributed, lowering the incidence of bottlenecks that impede performance. This is a highly scalable method of creating a distributed system.

However, recent trends show that many companies are moving away from this and sticking to a monolithic architecture. This is because it is difficult to achieve this level of harmony in the real world.

Microservices and service-oriented architecture are often compared, but the two frameworks are quite different and have unique uses in enterprise environments.

Service-oriented architecture (SOA) emerged in the early part of this century as an evolution of distributed computing. Before SOA, services were understood as the end result of the application ...