News

Here's How the DoD Can Achieve Continuous Process Improvement and Innovation Combining two of the most powerful organizational tools available can enable organizations to instill a culture of ...
The overhaul is based on recommendations by a “Tiger Team” of DoD senior experts. A DoD FMS Continuous Process Improvement Board has been established to implement the Tiger Team’s ...
One bearing the Army logo was the Defense Foreign Language School Rapid Improvement Event board. It showed a change in the process of incurring costs for non-Army students and a savings to the ...
The middle child often may be overlooked, and their contributions to the family dynamic may be undervalued. With this in mind, we can draw an analogy between the middle child in a family and the often ...
Continuous process improvement can benefit all aspects of life — from personal New Year’s resolutions to complex drug development. In a world where two-thirds of planned improvement ...
DOD needs better process improvement management The Defense Department isn't meeting all of its statutory requirements for improving processes related to the development, acquisition, and ...
Lean practitioners from across the Department of Defense came together to share, learn and educate each other during a Continuous Process Improvement workshop, held at Tobyhanna Army Depot, April ...
Defense and military personnel are now a part of an automated "continuous vetting" program that will flag concerning behavior or circumstances as part of the security clearance process.
All Department of Defense personnel will now have to go through "continuous vetting" and may soon be subject to surveillance of their social media posts in an attempt to spot extremists.
Learn about what process automation company IPTA can do to revolutionarily remake DOD processes using AI.
The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency announced Tuesday that all DoD clearance holders are now part of its continuous vetting program.
GAO performed a performance audit from December 2008 to September to determine the extent that DOD had met the law’s process improvement requirements and the effects of the department’s efforts.