judge funding freeze - Search News

Order byBest matchMost fresh

Harvard University, District Judge

Harvard Judge Questions Legality of $2 Billion Fund Freeze

A federal judge cast doubt on the legality of the Trump administration’s freezing of more than $2 billion in federal research funding for Harvard University.

NewsX · 3d

President Trump Slams ‘Trump-HATING’ Judge Over Harvard Funding Cut As Federal Court Questions $2B Freeze

· 2d

Judge questions legality of Harvard funding cuts

· 4h

Trump administration opens investigation into Harvard's use of visas

The Trump administration opened a new front in its battle with Harvard University on Tuesday, announcing it would investigate the school's eligibility to sponsor certain visas.

· 1d

Here’s what to know about Judge Allison Burroughs, federal jurist overseeing Harvard-Trump case

· 18h

Trump administration raises pressure on Harvard with state department probe

Scripps News on MSN3d

Judge weighs challenge to Trump's freeze on $2B in funds meant for Harvard

A federal judge is set to hear oral arguments on Monday in two lawsuits challenging the Trump administration’s decision to freeze more than $2 billion in federal funding for Harvard University.

2don MSN

Trump Admin’s Harvard funding freeze: Judge calls DOJ rationale ‘mind boggling’

Judge Allison Burroughs questioned the legality of the Trump-era freeze on $2B in federal research funds to Harvard, challenging DOJ claims tied to campus antisemitism. Harvard argues the action was retaliatory.

23don MSN

House Republicans call for investigation into Obama-appointed judge in Trump funding case

House Judiciary members claim Obama-appointed Judge McConnell violated ethics by ruling on Trump funding case while leading organization receiving federal grants.

The Harvard Crimson3d

At Oral Arguments in Harvard Funding Lawsuit, Judge Casts Doubt on Government’s Case

A federal judge on Monday appeared skeptical of the federal government’s justification for freezing nearly $3 billion in research funding to Harvard, as lawyers for the two parties asked for a speedy decision in a high-stakes case that could determine the future of Harvard’s research enterprise.