The peer-review process for psychological research is strained to the breaking point, jeopardizing the efficacy of the ...

What is peer review of teaching (PRT)? Peer review is recognized in academia as a measure for ensuring quality work that meets standards and expectations among experts. Similarly, peer review of ...

One of the concerns that arose from the Patrick case was a fear that no physician would want to participate in peer review if he or she could be potentially liable for a bad report. The HCQIA gave ...

Peer review can be stressful, even for the most seasoned scholarly writers. Will the reviewers “get” your book project or pan it? There is always a degree of uncertainty. But a negative review ...

What's wrong with peer review? Peter Lawrence, a developmental biologist who is also an editor at the journal Development and former editorial board member at Cell, has been publishing papers in ...

Government trial will invest nearly £5 million of taxpayers’ money in AI initiatives to modernise research processes ...

This guide is designed to provide faculty and departments with insights on performing effective peer review of teaching. It was developed in October 2017 by members of a Faculty Learning Community: ...

For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us using the feedback ...

Suggest potential reviewers Make a decision on the paper without further review (the manuscript will move to step ... the SME will evaluate the revised manuscript and either request further peer ...