Editorial Process & Peer Review. ... and decides whether it should be sent for peer review. ... If authors prefer not to make the review history of their paper at Nature Methods known to a new ...

Nature Photonics’ peer review process explained. Nature Photonics. All about review, August 2011. The role of editors and referees in peer review. Nature. There's a time to be critical, May 2011.

According to a report by Nikkei, research papers from 14 institutions across eight countries, including Japan, South Korea, ...

Reviewer 1: "This manuscript is a timely and important contribution to the field, with clear methodology and compelling ...

The peer review process has existed for more than 150 years. It became routine in its current form after World War II, as funding for bioscience research exploded along with specialization and ...

The peer-review process works provided the participants are invested in it. When a research finding is reported in a journal, journalists may need to review its editorial board.

Astronomer have found that a new process of evaluating proposed scientific research projects is as effective -- if not more so -- than the traditional peer-review method.

The Peer-Review Dilemma Scientific publication can be a constraining, flattening, and maddening process—but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. By Benjamin Mazer ...