Universities and colleges built budgets around federal largess. The Trump administration is forcing them to take a fiscal haircut on indirect costs.

Indirect funds are essential for supporting the research infrastructure needed to develop innovative solutions to the most pressing health challenges.

While Illinois joins states challenging cuts to medical research funding, an Illinois State University lab supported by the ...

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

The proposed cuts would place a 15% indirect cost rate on all new and existing grant awards received by research institutions and universities.

The proposed cap on grants is part of a raft of sweeping federal cost-cutting measures put in place by the Trump ...

The National Institutes of Health’s Office of the Director issued a policy change notice Feb. 7, announcing that the standard rate of indirect costs would be 15% for all current and future grants. The ...

Researchers and administrators at the University of North Dakota remain on edge this week as yet another federal decree threatens to disrupt millions of dollars in medical research funding. A federal ...

More than half a billion dollars are at stake for Massachusetts universities, hospitals, and research institutions if federal ...

The University of Utah could lose $43.5 million this year in federal funding for medical research expenses — which support ...

Efforts by the Trump administration to drastically cut federal investments in medical research are threatening to kneecap ...

Late last Friday, Feb. 7, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced it was immediately capping overhead rates on all ...