Universities and colleges built budgets around federal largess. The Trump administration is forcing them to take a fiscal haircut on indirect costs.

Indirect funds are essential for supporting the research infrastructure needed to develop innovative solutions to the most pressing health challenges.

While Illinois joins states challenging cuts to medical research funding, an Illinois State University lab supported by the ...

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

The administration isn’t just seeking to freeze or yank that funding; it’s also taking aim at the academic institutions that make scientific discovery possible. NIH has received $40 million annually ...

The proposed cuts would place a 15% indirect cost rate on all new and existing grant awards received by research institutions and universities.

The proposed cap on grants is part of a raft of sweeping federal cost-cutting measures put in place by the Trump ...

The National Institutes of Health’s Office of the Director issued a policy change notice Feb. 7, announcing that the standard rate of indirect costs would be 15% for all current and future grants. The ...

What’s the best way to care for a new mom dealing with high blood pressure and risk to her heart? How can people stem the ...

Researchers and administrators at the University of North Dakota remain on edge this week as yet another federal decree threatens to disrupt millions of dollars in medical research funding. A federal ...

Washington University's leader on Thursday upped the alarm on proposed funding changes for National Institutes of Health ...

A rate cut at the National Institutes of Health could cost the University of Alabama $2.85 million annually and diminish ...