For example, a 1982 dissertation, “Aging in Place: An Investigation of the Housing Consumption and Residential Mobility of the Elderly,” by James David Reschovsky, considers the stability of ...

Aging-in-Place — most of us think of this as the decision, as we get older, to stay in our longtime family homes, even as increasing infirmity or cognitive decline makes this harder.

Aging in place preserves access to friends and familiar services. Plus keeping your larger house means you have room for visiting family and friends, or — if your health requires it — a live ...

Essentially, aging in place is making the decision to stay put as you get older—and then making the necessary accommodations and renovations to make your home as safe and accessible as possible.

Aging in place, with six days per week of home health care accounted for, could total more than $10,000 per month, exceeding $20,000 per month when 24/7 in-home care is needed.

Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by ... In terms of money, aging in place doesn’t have to be expensive.

Aging in place in many cases is a wish, a hope or for some, a fantasy. It also may be the wrong choice to enhance well-being. Baby Boomers, their children and policymakers must ask instead how we ...

According to AARP, almost 90 percent of seniors would like to stay in their home as they age. This idea of aging in place — growing older where you already live, typically not in a health-care ...

So, despite their active lifestyle, when the McSweenys built their Edgewater, Md., house in 2013, they asked their architect to incorporate “aging-in-place” features — including an elevator ...

There’s no question that aging in place has broad appeal. In a 2005 survey by AARP, 89 percent of people age 50 and older said they would prefer to remain in their home indefinitely as they age.