The peer-review process for psychological research is strained to the breaking point, jeopardizing the efficacy of the ...
In October, I wrote “In Defense of Reader 2,” about the peer-review process and the notorious hypercritical reviewer known as “Reader 2” (in sending you peer reviews of your work ...
The power of peer review – giving and receiving constructive feedback – is often underestimated by some in the academia.
Government trial will invest nearly £5 million of taxpayers’ money in AI initiatives to modernise research processes ...
A group of 10 scientists, represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, has filed a petition against Sage Publications in ...
The Montana Supreme Court has upheld a District Court judge’s ruling in favor of St. Peter’s Health against Helena oncologist ...
Faith in institutions defined by their commitment to empiricism is waning, and I can understand the desire to look to peer ...
"We at the American Journal of Public Health have no interest in following the president's prohibitions on language," said ...
At the heart of the NIH’s mission to advance biomedical research is a careful and transparent peer review process. Key to this process are study sections — panels of scientists and subject matter ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback