The core issue in the dispute revolved around the interpretation of “disputed tax” under the DTVSV Act, specifically in relation to a disallowance of ₹80,19,59,658 made under Section 40 (a) (ia) of ...

The Union government has strongly objected to Elon Musk-owned X Corp’s characterisation of the ‘Sahyog’ portal as a ...

The Centre has informed the Karnataka High Court that X Corp. is attempting to mislead the court" about the law used to ...

The Centre accused X of hypocrisy, highlighting that the platform regularly removes content flagged by users or victims ...

During the trial, it was recorded that the doctors stated that death was due to cardiac arrest due to the injury. The ...

The Centre rebuffed X's challenge on Section 79(3)(b) notices, asserting it's essential for due diligence and distinct from ...

X Corp has argued that Section 79(3)(b) does not authorise the government to issue content-blocking orders in a manner that ...

India has criticised X for calling an official website for compliance as a censorship tool in a lawsuit filed by X against ...

High Court of Karnataka criticizes public bank for deducting entire pension, rules only 50% can be taken for loan.

The court emphasised that pension serves as financial security for retirees and should not be entirely diverted toward debt repayment, except in cases of fraud, forgery, or misconduct. Justice S G ...

The petitioners had argued that the "manufactured judgments" were the sole basis and reasoning given by the trial court for ...

The Centre argued that X had misinterpreted key provisions of the IT Act, particularly the distinctions between Section 69A ...