that dual-process theories are largely unfalsifiable, and that most of the claimed support for them is “confirmation bias at work” (p. 283). System 1 isn’t some error-prone decision-making ...

There are basically two types of decision-making processes. One is known as the ‘Analytical’ method, and the other is the ‘Intuitive’ or ‘Naturalistic’ method. In the Analytical process ... me of a ...

Though you could argue there are several traits that make someone a good decision-maker ... Scientists call this dual process theory, and you likely know it already thanks to Nobel Prize-winning ...

Game theory, the study of strategic decision-making, brings together elements ... to analyze a variety of real-life situations. The process of backward induction, for example, can help explain ...

But System 1 is part of a sophisticated system of dual processing ... of such information to feed our System 2 thinking, our decision might be at the mercy of our System 1 beliefs about ...

How widespread is this “dual-process” theory of the human mind? Greene: I haven’t taken a poll but it’s certainly—not just for morality but for decision-making in general—very hard to ...

A new theory of economic decision-making offers an explanation as to why humans, in general, make decisions that are simply adequate, not optimal. A new theory of economic decision-making from ...