Trump celebrated when the Supreme Court limited nationwide blocks on his policies, but judges are finding other ways to hinder his priorities.

I think there's a lot of confusion right now, and there are a lot of differing views from district courts about how to interpret California,” said attorney Julie Edelstein, referring to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Department of Education v.

The post The Problem With the Supreme Court's 'Shadow Docket' appeared first on Reason.com. Yes, it has to do with the Epstein files. Donald Trump gave a startlingly low number when asked if he had a sexual "age limit" during a now-resurfaced interview with Howard Stern.

WASHINGTON − An ideologically divided Supreme Court on July 14 allowed the Trump administration to fire hundreds of workers from the Education Department and continue other efforts to dismantle the agency. The court's three liberal justices opposed the order, the latest win for President Donald Trump at the high court.

Mark Joseph Stern: Under federal law, Trump cannot remove Powell over a policy disagreement. Federal law expressly allows for the removal of the Fed’s board members only for “cause”—something like abuse of office or malfeasance. That means Trump can’t just sack Powell because Trump wants to slash rates and Powell wants to keep them steady.

The Supreme Court, ruling in the birthright citizenship case, reined in federal judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions.